Changes between two versions
What changed between the draft committee report and the plenary report
From · draft committee report· 21 Jun 2022
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the internal markets in renewable and natural gases and in hydrogen (recast)
To · plenary report· 17 Feb 2023
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the internal markets in renewable and natural gases and in hydrogen (recast)
These two texts have too little in common to compare paragraph by paragraph: they are different documents rather than versions of one (for example one group’s motion and the joint text that was adopted).
+1,379 added · −158 removed · 3 changed paragraphs, packaging included.
Part 27 of 30: Paragraphs 1427–1437
Added:THE COUNCIL
Added:THE COMMISSION
Added:Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the internal markets in renewable and natural gases and in hydrogen
Added:COM(2021) 803 final of 15.12.2021 – 2021/0425 (COD)
Added:Having regard to the Inter-institutional Agreement of 28 November 2001 on a more structured use of the recasting technique for legal acts, and in particular to point 9 thereof, the Consultative Working Party consisting of the respective legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission met on 6 December 2022 for the purpose of further examining, following up to the previous meeting held on 9 August 2022, the aforementioned proposal submitted by the Commission.
Added:At that meetings, an examination of the proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council recasting Directive 2009/73/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas resulted in the Consultative Working Party's establishing, by common accord, that, in addition to the twelve indents contained in point 1 of the Consultative Working Party's opinion dated 25 October 2022, a further remark is also considered appropriate with regard to the draft recast text.
Added:In recital 126 the deletion of the third and fourth sentences of recital 43 of Directive 2009/73/EC should have been marked with the grey-shaded type generally used for identifying substantive amendments.
Added:In consequence, examination of the proposal has enabled the Consultative Working Party to conclude, without dissent, that the proposal does not comprise any substantive amendments other than those identified as such. The Working Party also concluded, as regards the codification of the unchanged provisions of the earlier act with those substantive amendments, that the proposal contains a straightforward codification of the existing legal text, without any change in its substance.
Added:F. DREXLER J.B. LAIGNELOT D. CALLEJA CRESPO
Added:Jurisconsult acting Director-General Director-General
Added:08.11.2022