Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

Changes between two versions

What changed between the draft committee report and the plenary report

From · draft committee report· 1 Jun 2022

ECON-PR-731819

on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2013/36/EU as regards supervisory powers, sanctions, third-country branches, and environmental, social and governance risks, and amending Directive 2014/59/EU

To · plenary report· 10 Feb 2023

A-9-2023-0029

on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2013/36/EU as regards supervisory powers, sanctions, third-country branches, and environmental, social and governance risks, and amending Directive 2014/59/EU

These two texts have too little in common to compare paragraph by paragraph: they are different documents rather than versions of one (for example one group’s motion and the joint text that was adopted).

+1,008 added · −168 removed · 3 changed paragraphs, packaging included.

Part 20 of 20: Paragraphs 1141–1192

Added:(ii) risks that are fully covered by the calculation set out in Article 92(3) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013.’;

Added:▌

Added:(e) paragraphs 11 and 12 are replaced by the following:

Added:‘11. Where the setting or resetting of a systemic risk buffer rate or rates on any set or subset of exposures referred to in paragraph 5 subject to one or more systemic risk buffers results in a combined systemic risk buffer rate at a level higher than 3 % and up to 5 % for any of those exposures, the competent authority or the designated authority of the Member State that sets that buffer shall request in the notification submitted in accordance with paragraph 9 the opinions of the Commission and the ESRB.

Added:Within a month of receipt of the notification referred to in paragraph 9, the ESRB shall provide the Commission with an opinion as to whether the systemic risk buffer rate or rates is deemed appropriate. Within two months of receipt of the notification, the Commission, taking into account the assessment of the ESRB, shall provide its opinion as to whether it considers that the systemic risk buffer rate or rates do not entail disproportionate adverse effects on the whole or parts of the financial system of other Member States or of the Union as a whole forming or creating an obstacle to the proper functioning of the internal market.

Added:Where the opinion of the Commission is negative, the competent authority or the designated authority, as applicable, of the Member State that sets that systemic risk buffer shall comply with that opinion or give reasons for not doing so.

Added:Where one or more institutions to which one or more systemic risk buffer rates apply is a subsidiary the parent of which is established in another Member State, the ESRB and the Commission shall also consider in their opinions whether applying the systemic risk buffer rate or rates to those institutions is deemed appropriate.

Added:Where the authorities of the subsidiary and of the parent disagree on the systemic risk buffer rate or rates applicable to that institution and in the case of a negative opinion of both the Commission and the ESRB, the competent authority or the designated authority, as applicable, may refer the matter to EBA and request its assistance in accordance with Article 19 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010. The decision to set the systemic risk buffer rate or rates for those exposures shall be suspended until EBA has taken a decision.

Added:For the purposes of this paragraph, the recognition of a systemic risk buffer rate set by another Member State in accordance with Article 134 shall not count towards the thresholds referred to in the first subparagraph of this paragraph.

Added:12. Where the setting or resetting of a systemic risk buffer rate or rates on any set or subset of exposures referred to in paragraph 5 subject to one or more systemic risk buffers results in a combined systemic risk buffer rate higher than 5 % for any of those exposures, the competent authority or the designated authority, as applicable, shall seek the authorisation of the Commission before implementing a systemic risk buffer.

Added:Within six weeks of receipt of the notification referred to in paragraph 9 of this Article, the ESRB shall provide the Commission with an opinion as to whether the systemic risk buffer is deemed appropriate. EBA may also provide the Commission with its opinion on that systemic risk buffer in accordance with Article 16a(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, within six weeks of receipt of the notification.

Added:Within three months of receipt of the notification referred to in paragraph 9, the Commission, taking into account the assessment of the ESRB and EBA, where relevant, and where it is satisfied that the systemic risk buffer rate or rates do not entail disproportionate adverse effects on the whole or parts of the financial system of other Member States or of the Union as a whole forming or creating an obstacle to the proper functioning of the internal market, shall adopt an act authorising the competent authority or the designated authority, as applicable, to adopt the proposed measure.

Added:For the purposes of this paragraph, the recognition of a systemic risk buffer rate set by another Member State in accordance with Article 134 shall not count towards the threshold referred to in the first subparagraph of this paragraph.’;

Added:(33) Article 142 is amended as follows:

Added:(a) in paragraph 2, point (c) is replaced by the following:

Added:‘(c) a plan and timeframe for the increase of own funds with the objective of meeting fully the combined buffer requirement or, where applicable, the leverage ratio buffer requirement;’;

Added:(b) paragraph 3 is replaced by the following:

Added:‘3. The competent authority shall assess the capital conservation plan, and shall approve the plan only if it considers that the plan, if implemented, would be reasonably likely to conserve or raise sufficient capital to enable the institution to meet its combined buffer requirement or, where applicable, its leverage ratio buffer requirement within a period which the competent authority considers appropriate.’;

Added:(c) in paragraph 4, point (b) is replaced by the following:

Added:‘(b) exercise its powers under Article 102 to impose more stringent restrictions on distributions than those required by Articles 141 and 141b, as applicable.’;

Added:(33a) in Article 145, the following point is added:

Added:‘(ia) content and format of the transition plans referred to in Article 76 to ensure a consistent application of this Directive.’;

Added:(34) in Article 161, paragraph 3 is deleted.

Added:Amendments to Directive 2014/59/EU

Added:Directive 2014/59/EU*15 is amended as follows:

Added:(1) in Article 27, the following paragraphs 6, 7 and 8 are added:

Added:‘6. When new members of the management body or senior management are appointed under this Article and Article 28 of this Directive, Member States shall ensure that competent authorities carry out the assessment of the members of the management body as required by Article 91b(1) of Directive 2013/36/EU and of the key function holders as required by Article 91d(1) of that Directive only after they take up their position.

Added:Article 91a(2) and Article 91c(2) of Directive 2013/36/EU shall not apply to the appointment of new members of the management body or senior management referred to in the first subparagraph.

Added:7. Competent authorities shall ensure that they perform the assessments referred to in paragraph 6 without undue delay. They shall complete the assessments at the latest 20 working days from the date they receive the notification of appointment.

Added:8. Competent authorities shall inform the resolution authority without undue delay about the outcome of the assessments referred to in paragraph 6.’;

Added:(2) in Article 34, the following paragraphs 7, 8 and 9 are added:

Added:‘7. When new members of the management body or senior management are appointed under this Article and Article 63 of this Directive, Member States shall ensure that competent authorities carry out the assessment of the members of the management body as required by Article 91b(1) of Directive 2013/36/EU and of the key function holders as required by Article 91d(1) of that Directive only after they take up their position.

Added:Article 91a(2) and Article 91c(2) of Directive 2013/36/EU shall not apply to the appointment of new members of the management body or senior management referred to in the first subparagraph.

Added:The first and second subparagraphs shall also apply to the assessment of the members of the management body of the bridge institution appointed under Article 41 immediately after taking resolution action.

Added:8. Competent authorities shall ensure that they perform the assessments referred to in paragraph 7 without undue delay. They shall complete the assessments at the latest 20 working days from the date they receive the notification of appointment.

Added:9. Competent authorities shall inform the resolution authority without undue delay about the outcome of the assessments referred to in paragraph 7.’;

Added:_______

Added:*15 Directive 2014/59/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 establishing a framework for the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms and amending Council Directive 82/891/EEC, and Directives 2001/24/EC, 2002/47/EC, 2004/25/EC, 2005/56/EC, 2007/36/EC, 2011/35/EU, 2012/30/EU and 2013/36/EU, and Regulations (EU) No 1093/2010 and (EU) No 648/2012, of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 173 12.6.2014, p. 190)

Added:Transposition

Added:1. Member States shall adopt and publish by [OP please insert the date = 18 months from the date of entry into force of this amending Directive] at the latest, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive. They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions.

Added:They shall apply those provisions from [OP please insert the date = 1 day after the transposition date of this amending Directive].

Added:However, the provisions necessary to comply with the amendments set out in Article 1, point (8), on the prudential supervision of third country branches shall apply from [OP please insert the date = 12 months from date of application of this amending Directive].

Added:By derogation from the preceding subparagraph, Member States shall apply the provisions on reporting on third country branches in Title VI, Chapter 1, Section II, Sub-section 4 of Directive 2013/36/EU, as inserted by this Directive, from the date of application laid down in the second subparagraph of this Article.

Added:When Member States adopt those provisions, they shall contain a reference to this Directive or be accompanied by such a reference on the occasion of their official publication. Member States shall determine how such reference is to be made.

Added:2. Member States shall communicate to the Commission the text of the main provisions of national law which they adopt in the field covered by this Directive.

Added:Entry into force

Added:This Directive shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Added:Addressees

Added:This Directive is addressed to the Member States.

Added:Done at Brussels,

Added:For the European Parliament For the Council

Added:The President The President