Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

Changes between two versions

What changed between the draft committee report and the plenary report

From · draft committee report· 3 Oct 2024

BUDG-PR-763249

on the Council position on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025

To · plenary report· 15 Oct 2024

A-10-2024-0008

on the Council position on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025

AI:What changed, in short

The report now deplores Council cuts and proposes restoring them, with increased funding for many programmes.3810 Adds new priorities: rule of law conditionality, own resources reform, gender equality, and support for Ukraine and Moldova.43544 Expands on climate, biodiversity, and health, with specific increases for EU4Health, LIFE, and Civil Protection.242532 Introduces calls for a single seat of Parliament and changes to building and visitor policies.45464748 Other changes are formal or wording: renumbering, minor rephrasing, and updates to cross-references.15718

45 changes of substance · 0 formal · 6 of wording only

Written by AI from the two texts only · read the changes before relying on it · 4 Sept 2026 · Report a problem

+53 added · −23 removed · 41 changed paragraphs, packaging included.

Part 3 of 4: Paragraphs 121–180

66. Reinforces Heading 4 overall by EUR 62 000 000 in commitment appropriations above the DB and by EUR 127 873 362 compared to the Council reading;

Heading 5 - Security and Defence

Change 39

Changed:55.67. Recalls the highly unstable geopolitical situation and international environment around the Union giving rise to greater security and defence challenges since the beginning of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine; considers that the Union's current budget for ensuring the security of Europeans is not equal to the challenges to be met in the short and long term; therefore supports significantly increasing financial and budgetary EU investment for European defence; calls on the European Commission to pay particular attention to the EU’s external borders neighbouring Russia and frontline countries;

Change 40

Changed:56.68. Underlines the need to top up the Internal Security Fund to ensure sufficient funding for the fight against serious and organised crime with a cross border dimensiondimension, cybercrime as well as cybercrime;funding to tackle terrorism and radicalisation; stresses that financial reinforcements are also crucial for combatting the rise of anti-Semitism in Europe by supporting multinational projects on best practices and enhancing exchange of information; considers a reinforcement of EUR 5 million to be justified for this purpose; restores Secure Connectivity to the level of the DB in order not to delay the advancement of a recently agreed programme;

Change 41

Changed:57.69. Highlights in particular the importance of reinforcing the means for European cooperation in defence matters;matters and the harmonisation of the defence sector to better respond to the unprecedented geopolitical challenges; considers that such cooperation not only makes Europe and its citizens safer but also leads to greater efficiency, potential savings and strategic autonomy; notes the importance of ‘military mobility’ in funding dual-use transport infrastructure, enabling Member States to rapidly concentrate military power in the context of the war and to support missions and operations under the common security and defence policy; underlines that the programme is oversubscribed and has substantial absorption capacity; decides, therefore, to increase appropriations for ‘military mobility’ by EUR 20 million above the DB;

Change 42

Removed:58. Recalls the crucial role played by decentralised agencies operating in the field of security and law enforcement, in particular with regard to the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and the European Union Drugs Agency (EUDA) which have both seen their mandates expanded; proposes targeted staffing increases to allow them to properly perform their new tasks;

Added:70. Strongly supports EU efforts to tackle rising security threats such as the spread of disinformation, including online disinformation, fake news campaigns against the EU, terrorism, radicalisation and violent extremism within the EU and its neighbouring countries;

Added:71. Recalls the crucial role played by decentralised agencies operating in the field of security and law enforcement, in particular with regard to the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and the European Union Drugs Agency (EUDA) which have both seen their mandates expanded; proposes targeted staffing increases and financial reinforcements to allow them to properly perform their new tasks;

72. Reinforces Heading 5 overall by EUR 41 000 000 in commitment appropriations above the DB and by EUR 46 000 000 compared to the Council;

Heading 6 - Neighbourhood and the World

Change 43

Changed:60.73. Emphasises that, and once more as a consequence of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, the international context has deteriorated rapidly as a result of the food, energyenergy, humanitarian and economic crises,crises , which have dramatically increased pressure on Heading 6; welcomes the fact that the introduction of the Ukraine Facility andover the Western BalkanMFF Facilityceilings overand the MFFWestern ceilingsBalkan Facility provides a stable basis for support for Ukraine and the Western Balkan countries and releases some pressure on the availabilities within Heading 6 and more particularly on the cushion and buffers in the NDICI envelope; reminds that the commensurate redeployments leave behindgenerate gaps on some other budget lines which are difficult to manage;

Change 44

Removed:61. Stresses the importance of the Southern Neighbourhood line in supporting political, economic and social reforms in the region; taking into consideration the increasing humanitarian needs in the region as well as other purposes of regional cooperation in providing assistance to refugees, in particular Syrian and Palestinian refugees, and in enabling support along the southern migration routes; proposes to increase appropriations for the line by EUR 60 million above the DB, including to reinforce funding for UNRWA based on EU regulations and values;

Added:74. Reiterates its full support to Ukraine in the fight for its freedom and democracy; deplores the terrible impact of lives and the suffering of Ukraine People caused by unprovoked and unjustifiable Russia's war of aggression; welcomes the decision to grant the Ukraine candidate country status and insists on the need to deploy the necessary funds to support its accession process;

Removed:62. Underlines that the war continues to have significant effects on countries in the Eastern Neighbourhood, such as Moldova, that have provided shelter and assistance to refugees fleeing the war and faced the knock-on effects of sky-high inflation and energy prices; underlines the importance of sustained support for candidate countries in implementing the necessary accession-related reforms and in enhancing their resilience and preventing and countering hybrid threats; decides, therefore, to increase appropriations by EUR 50 million above the DB for the Eastern Neighbourhood; proposes, furthermore, to increase accession-related support under the Instrument for Pre-Accession (IPA III) by EUR 3 million in 2025;

Added:75. Stresses the importance of the Southern Neighbourhood line in supporting political, economic and social reforms in the region taking into consideration the increasing humanitarian needs in the region as well as other purposes of regional cooperation in providing assistance to refugees, in particular Syrian and Palestinian refugees, and in enabling support along the southern migration routes; proposes to increase appropriations for the line by EUR 60 million above the DB, including to reinforce funding for UNRWA based on EU regulations and values;

Removed:63. Proposes to place an amount of EUR 30 million in reserve that can be lifted upon an unconditional withdrawal by the Georgian Government of the controversial law on 'transparency of foreign influence' and a clear commitment that it would not propose such a law again;

Added:76. Underlines that the war continues to have significant effects on countries in the Eastern Neighbourhood, such as the Republic of Moldova, that have provided shelter and assistance to refugees fleeing the war and faced the knock-on effects of sky-high inflation and energy prices; stresses the need for targeted financial and technical assistance to help these countries stabilise their economies and strengthen public infrastructure amidst these pressures; underlines the importance of sustained support for candidate countries in implementing the necessary accession-related reforms and in enhancing their resilience and preventing and countering hybrid threats; decides, therefore, to increase appropriations by EUR 50 million above the DB for the Eastern Neighbourhood to address these complex challenges; proposes, furthermore, to increase accession-related support under the Instrument for Pre-Accession (IPA III) by EUR 3 million in 2025 to accelerate the reform process, enhance resilience, and ensure a smooth transition towards EU standards;

Removed:64. Shares the Council’s assessment that the need for humanitarian aid needs have reached new heights; considers that, given the highly challenging international context and the ongoing climate change-induced emergencies, humanitarian aid needs in 2025 are likely to be even higher than estimated by the Council, in particular since humanitarian aid to Ukraine will continue to be covered under Heading 6 rather than the Ukraine Facility; proposes, therefore, to increase appropriations for humanitarian aid by EUR 120 million compared to the DB;

Added:77. Proposes to place an amount of EUR 30 million in reserve that can be lifted upon an unconditional withdrawal by the Georgian Government of the controversial law on 'transparency of foreign influence' and a clear commitment that it would not propose such a law again; further emphasises the importance of ensuring that any legislative action aligns with democratic principles, transparency, and human rights, reinforcing Georgia’s pathway towards European integration; underlines that the remaining funding for Georgia should be redirected as much as possible to support civil society.

Removed:65. Wishes to add item lines in the new budget article for the Western Balkan Facility, following up on a previous declaration and the intention of the Council regarding a new nomenclature; proposes to create one line per beneficiary country in the region without putting into question the facility’s reform incentives and intervention logic]; ensures, thus, better transparency and accountability to the budget authority;

Added:78. Proposes to reinforce funding for several budget lines under the NDICI chapter, in particular the Global Challenges thematic strand; emphasises the importance of strengthening cooperation with African countries, particularly in the areas of sustainable development and economic partnership and in line with the existing instruments of enhanced cooperation between EU Member States and African countries; stresses the importance of the People strand in reducing catastrophic food insecurity in many countries in the World and in supporting health, education, gender equality and women’s and girls’ empowerment; highlights that support to women and girls to access quality education significantly improves their chances to acquire the knowledge and skills to compete in the labour market, gain life skills necessary to navigate and make decisions about their own lives; highlights the need to ensure sufficient EU support to promote the protection of women’s rights, sexual and reproductive health and LGBTIQ+ rights and to further reinforce the work on these aspects by civil society organisations, human rights defenders and journalists, especially in countries where these rights are under threat;

Added:79. Shares the Council’s assessment that the needs for humanitarian aid have reached new heights; considers that, given the highly challenging international context, increasing geopolitical instability, accelerating humanitarian disasters around the globe, rising extreme poverty and hunger, and the ongoing climate change-induced emergencies, humanitarian aid needs in 2025 are expected to be much higher than estimated by the Council and the Commission, not least since humanitarian aid to Ukraine will continue to be covered under Heading 6 rather than the Ukraine Facility; points out that the Union’s humanitarian aid budget has relied heavily on the Emergency Aid Reserve (EAR), driving resources away from the EAR’s other objectives and reducing the Union’s ability to respond to emergencies; insists that the proposal with the possible mobilisations of EAR will still fall short of needs and regrets that the lack of available margin under Heading 6 does not allow for further reinforcement; proposes, therefore, to increase appropriations for humanitarian aid by EUR 120 million compared to the DB;

Added:80. Wishes to add item lines in the new budget article for the Western Balkan Facility, following up on a previous declaration and the intention of the Council regarding a new nomenclature; proposes to create one line per beneficiary country in the region without putting into question the facility’s reform incentives and intervention logic; ensures, thus, better transparency and accountability to the budget authority;

Added:81. Calls for consistent and sustainable budgeting for all gender-related activities in the EU Defence and Security sector, in line with the EU Action Plan on Women, Peace and Security;

11 unchanged paragraphs

82. Further to strengthening the availabilities in the external policies heading, proposes to add EUR 4 million to the budget line for civilian CSDP missions and EUR 1 million to Nuclear Safety;

83. Overall, reinforces Heading 6 by EUR 256 200 000 in commitment appropriations above the DB and by EUR 234 461 645 compared to the Council reading;

Heading 7 - European Public Administration

84. Recalls that spending under Heading 7 should be set at a level that guarantees that the Union has an effective and efficient administration; considers that the Council’s cuts in this heading are unjustified and would not allow the Commission to recruit suitable staff in Luxembourg and to fulfil its tasks; restores therefore the DB for the Commission administrative expenditure, including with respect to its Offices;

Pilot projects and preparatory actions (PP-PAs)

85. Recalls the importance of pilot projects and preparatory actions (PP-PAs) as tools for the formulation of political priorities and the introduction of new initiatives that have the potential to turn into standing Union activities and programmes; adopts, following a careful analysis of all the proposals submitted and taking fully into account the Commission's assessment of their compliance with legal requirements and implementability, a balanced package of PP-PAs that reflects Parliament’s political priorities; calls on the Commission to swiftly implement PP-PAs and provide feedback on their performance and results delivered on the ground;

Payments

86. Underlines the need to provide a sufficient level of payment appropriations in the 2025 budget and decides, as a general rule, to reinforce payment appropriations on those lines which are amended in commitment appropriations;

Other Sections

Section I – European Parliament

87. Maintains unchanged the overall level of its budget for 2025 set at EUR 2 499 233 329, in line with its estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2025; incorporates budgetary-neutral adjustments to reflect updated information which was not available earlier this year;

Change 45

Removed:72. Reiterates the Parliament’s priorities for the forthcoming financial year, namely, focusing Parliament’s budget on its core functions of co-legislator, acting as one arm of the budgetary authority, representing citizens and scrutinizing the work of other institutions, as well as providing the resources for cyber-security and IT development and priority projects on engaging with citizens as well as green and accessible Parliament;

Added:88. Calls for an establishment of the Single Seat of the European Parliament;

Added:89. Reiterates the Parliament’s priorities for the forthcoming financial year, namely, focusing Parliament’s budget on its core functions of co-legislator, acting as one arm of the budgetary authority, representing citizens and scrutinizing the work of other institutions and the implementation of EU legislation, as well as providing the resources for cyber-security and IT development and priority projects on engaging with citizens as well as green and accessible Parliament;

90. In line with its resolution of 25 April 2024 on its estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2025 and taking into account the answers provided by the Secretary-General of the Parliament on 2 September 2024:

Change 46

Changed:(a) recalls that visitors groups in all the places of work of the Parliament represent an important tool for Members to connect with constituents and to demonstrate their parliamentary work to constituents; welcomes the fact that the Secretary-General will propose to the Quaestors to adjust the ceilings in lineto withreflect the increase ofincreased costs tofaced beby covered;visitors groups; expects the decision on the adjustment of the ceilings to be taken as soon as possible;

(b) notes that it is planned to have 19 European Experiences opened outside Brussels by end of 2025; reiterates its calls for the establishment of Europa Experiences in all Member States as soon as possible; recalls that Europa Experiences should allow all citizens to have a better understanding of the functioning of the Union institutions;

Change 47

Changed:(c) notes that Parliament is working on a building renovation plan and a comprehensive long-term building strategy to take into account new ways of workingworking, costs, budgetary constraints and the targets and objectives of the Green Deal and ‘Fit for 55’ legislative package; expects the Committee on Budgets to be informed in a timely manner;

Change 48

Removed:(d) highlights that one of the most powerful weapons against disinformation is fact-based communication regarding the Parliament’s activities; welcomes the comprehensive actions taken by the services, including the EPLOs, in that regard; expects that such activities are further strengthened, including the close cooperation with other EU institutions and security services in Member States;

Added:(d) looks forward to the installation of photovoltaic panels to full capacity in the PFLIMLIN and DE MADARIAGA and CHURCHILL buildings;

Added:(e) insists on the need to increase chartered train capacity between Brussels and Strasbourg in 2025;

Added:(f) highlights that one of the most powerful weapons against disinformation is fact-based communication regarding the Parliament’s activities including outreach in the languages of linguistic minorities and communities, where appropriate; welcomes the comprehensive actions taken by the services, including the EPLOs, in that regard; expects that such activities are further strengthened, including the close cooperation with other EU institutions and security services in Member States;

(g) recalls that the Secretary-General committed to initiate discussions with the responsible governing bodies before the end of 2024 on the possibility for APAs, subject to certain conditions, to accompany Members of the European Parliament on official Parliament delegations and missions during the conciliation between the Bureau and the Committee on Budgets on Preliminary Draft Estimates of the European Parliament for 2025 last April.

Change 49

Added:91. Takes note that Article 44(2) of the Implementing Measures of the Members of the European Parliament Statute provides for the possibility to finance extra costs linked to the parliamentary assistance budgets transferring appropriations from their General Expenditure Allowance (GEA); calls on Parliament's administration to take the necessary measures to enable Members who wish to do so to use their GEA to cover the cost of APA missions; highlights that such a measure would help Members to address their increasing staffing needs while being budgetary neutral;

Added:92. Points out that multilingualism is a fundamental principle that makes the content of deliberations in the EU institutions more accessible and transparent, and ensures that proceedings are democratic;

4 unchanged paragraphs

Other Sections (Sections IV-X)

93. Is deeply concerned with the situation of Heading 7 of the current MFF; recalls that the constraints are the results of the cuts applied by the Council to the Commission’s already very low initial proposal when agreeing on the current MFF 2021-2027; regrets the Council’s opposition to the Commission’s proposal to increase the ceiling of Heading 7 in the MFF revision as from 2024; points to the failure to address the issue of the ceiling of Heading 7 in the MFF revision; highlights that the forecasted negative margin for 2025 presupposes the use of special instruments in Heading 7 for that purpose;

94. Condemns the Commission’s horizontal approach to reduce the estimates of the institutions in order to adhere to the principle of stable staffing, and to a maximum increase of 2 % for non-salary related expenditure, despite the inflationary context and irrespective of new tasks given to the institutions by the Commission and the co-legislators; underlines the negative consequences of this approach on the work of the institutions and working conditions of their staff;

95. Highlights that the largest parts of the institutions’ budgets are fixed by statutory or contractual obligations impacted by inflation; is concerned about the high cost of living and the increasing prices in Luxembourg, in particular the rising housing costs entailing difficulties for all institutions based in Luxembourg in recruiting staff; highlights the importance of the housing allowance as a temporary solution to this challenge; rejects the Council’s horizontal approach to cut the appropriations for the housing allowances in these institutions;

Change 50

Changed:77.96. Rejects the Council decision to reduce the estimates of the Commission, of the Court of Justice and of the European Court of Auditors by an additional amount in order to compensate for the housing allowance in the Parliament budget; is of the opinion that inviting the Parliament to reconsider its position on the allowance in its own budget by reducing the estimates of the other institutions by the corresponding amount is against the gentlemen’s agreement;

4 unchanged paragraphs

97. Highlights the need for the institutions to have sufficient staff in order to fulfil their mandate; welcomes the continuous efforts made by the institutions to redeploy staff and find additional efficiency gains but recognises the limits of this approach over the years; stresses the inevitability of reinforcing the amount of staff when necessary in order for the institutions to fulfil their mandates;

98. In line with the gentlemen’s agreement, does not modify the Council’s reading concerning the Council and the European Council;

99. Increases, for the following duly justified cases, the level of appropriations or staff above the DB in order to give the institutions enough resources to perform adequately, efficiently and effectively the growing number of tasks from their mandate and to be equipped for the upcoming challenges, in particular as regards cyber-security; proposes therefore to:

(a) restore the level of appropriations in line with the estimates of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Ombudsman, by increasing the level of appropriations above the DB for budgetary lines that cover cyber-security and operational needs;

Change 51

Changed:(b) restore the level of appropriations partially in line with the estimates of the European Court of Auditors, the European Economic and Social Committee, the European Committee of the Regions, the European Data Protection Supervisor and the European External Action Service by increasing the appropriations above the DB for budgetary lines thatcovering coverbuilding security, particularly in delegations, cyber-security and operational needs;

(c) increase the establishment plans above the DB with the corresponding appropriations in line with the institutions’ requests for the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Data Protection Supervisor and European Data Protection Board and partially in line with the institutions’ requests for the European Economic and Social Committee and the European Committee of the Regions, to enable them to face increasing workload and cyber-security challenges.