Changes between two versions
What changed between the plenary report of 7 Dec 2023 and the plenary report of 15 Oct 2025
From · plenary report· 7 Dec 2023
on the proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Union-wide effect of certain driving disqualifications
To · plenary report· 15 Oct 2025
on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive (EU) 2025/… as regards certain driving disqualifications
These two texts have too little in common to compare paragraph by paragraph: they are different documents rather than versions of one (for example one group’s motion and the joint text that was adopted).
+11 added · −82 removed · 5 changed paragraphs, packaging included.
Part 2 of 5: DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION
Changed:on the proposalCouncil forposition at first reading with a Directiveview to the adoption of a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council onamending theDirective Union-wide(EU) effect2025/… ofas regards certain driving disqualifications
Changed:(COM(2023)0128(08351/1/2025 – C9-0036/2023C100231/2025 – 2023/0055(COD))
Changed:(Ordinary legislative procedure: firstsecond reading)
The European Parliament,
Changed:– having regard to the CommissionCouncil proposalposition toat Parliamentfirst andreading the(08351/1/2025 Council- (COM(2023)0128),C10-0231/2025),
Removed:– having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 91(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C9-0036/2023),
Removed:– having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 14 June 2023,
– after consulting the Committee of the Regions,
Removed:– having regard to Rule 59 of its Rules of Procedure,
Added:– having regard to its position at first reading on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2023)0128),
Changed:– having regard to theArticle report294(7) of the CommitteeTreaty on Transportthe andFunctioning Tourismof (A9-0410/2023),the European Union,
Change 1
Removed:1. Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out;
Added:– having regard to the provisional agreement approved by the committee responsible under Rule 75(4) of its Rules of Procedure,
Removed:2. Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it replaces, substantially amends or intends to substantially amend its proposal;
Added:– having regard to Rule 68 of its Rules of Procedure,
Added:– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A10-0193/2025),
Added:1. Approves the Council position at first reading;
Added:2. Notes that the act is adopted in accordance with the Council position;
Added:3. Instructs its President to sign the act with the President of the Council, in accordance with Article 297(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Added:4. Instructs its Secretary-General to sign the act, once it has been verified that all the procedures have been duly completed, and, in agreement with the Secretary-General of the Council, to arrange for its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union;
5. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.
Change 2
Removed:Recital 6: (6) However, the implementation of this Directive should respect the principle of subsidiarity and not require the harmonisation of national rules concerning the definition of road traffic offences, their legal nature and the applicable sanctions for such offences. In particular, the Union-wide effect of driving disqualifications should be pursued regardless of the qualification of the national measures in the Member State of offence as administrative or criminal. When applying a Union-wide driving disqualification, within the existing legal limits of the national rules in that regard, the Member States should aim to align their decisions, as much as possible.