Changes between two versions
What changed between the plenary report and the adopted text
From · plenary report· 4 Dec 2025
with recommendations to the Commission on digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of work
To · adopted text· 17 Dec 2025
Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of work
AI:What changed, in short
The versions differ only in formal and wording changes: percentage formatting, punctuation, regulation citation, and removal of the word 'legislative' and an amendment reference.1234
0 changes of substance · 6 formal · 2 of wording only
Written by AI from the two texts only · read the changes before relying on it · 4 Sept 2026 · Report a problem
+4 added · −15 removed · 9 changed paragraphs, packaging included.
Part 4 of 5: Paragraphs 152–164
13 unchanged paragraphs
Member States should ensure tailored guidance and dedicated support mechanisms to assist SMEs in understanding and effectively implementing any obligations related to automated monitoring and automated decision-making systems.
Recommendation 9
Enforcement
The proposal should provide that the Commission, Member States, their national competent authorities and the social partners cooperate, share best practices in order to build capacities, and ensure effective enforcement.
The proposal should ensure that workers exercising their rights are protected against adverse treatment, retaliation and dismissal and have access to evidence in administrative and judicial proceedings.
Recommendation 10
Supervision
The proposal should ensure that data protection authorities established under the General Data Protection Regulation also monitor the application of its provisions in relation to data processing in employment contexts, in cooperation with national labour authorities and other competent authorities.
Recommendation 11
Non-Regression and More Favourable Provisions
The rules and safeguards resulting from these recommendations should provide a level of protection that is at least equivalent to that provided by existing Union law, including the Platform Work Directive, the Artificial Intelligence Act, the Digital Services Act, and the General Data Protection Regulation.
The proposal should not constitute valid grounds for reducing the general level of protection already afforded to workers within Member States.
The proposal should ensure that Member States and social partners remain free to introduce or maintain more favourable provisions.